Portrait of Meida Istiqomah

AVAILABLE FOR WORK

Meida Istiqomah

GIS & Data Specialist, AI / Automation R&D

4+ years of experience as a GIS & Data Specialist. Currently designing & deploying production AI/automation tools at Chronicle, spanning data pipelines to AI workflows.

From Vibe Coder to Solution Architect

Currently working as AI/Automation R&D Specialist at Chronicle, building production-ready automation tools including data matching pipelines, AI-powered QA validators, and document processing systems that handle tens of thousands of records.

I work at the intersection of geospatial analysis, data engineering, and applied AI.

Career Journey

Nov 2025 · Present

AI/Automation R&D Specialist @ Chronicle Cemetery Software

  • 13 production-ready automation & AI tools in 5 months, reducing data pipeline bottlenecks
  • Automated multi-source fuzzy matching & merging pipeline (thousands to tens of thousands of rows)
  • AI-powered Auto QC system (Data Integrity & Format Validator) for pre-upload validation
  • Integrated AI APIs & Agent CLI into production (Headstone Transcribe, Document Categorizer, etc.)

Aug 2024 · Oct 2025

GIS Project & Support Team Lead @ Chronicle Cemetery Software

  • Oversaw end-to-end GIS delivery for 3 new clients/month, 99% QC accuracy
  • Redesigned GIS workflows, improving team efficiency by 30% without compromising quality
  • 2 Python automation scripts/month replacing manual, repeatable tasks

Oct 2022 · Sep 2024

GIS Support Specialist → GIS Analyst @ Chronicle Cemetery Software

  • Converted multi-format legacy data (CAD, Excel, Access, drone imagery) into structured GIS databases
  • Processed drone imagery (Agisoft Photoscan, Pix4D) into high-resolution orthomosaics

Earlier Roles

  • Urban Planner Expert Assistant, DPU PR Kab. Natuna (1:5,000 RDTR mapping, ArcGIS + SPOT 6 imagery)
  • Land Surveyor & Data Entry, Bantul Land & Spatial Planning Office (field survey & land registry)
  • Staff Intern & Practicum Assistant, Bappeda Sleman & UGM Remote Sensing & GIS Diploma

2019 · 2022

Diploma III, Remote Sensing & GIS @ Universitas Gadjah Mada

  • Remote sensing image processing, spatial analysis, and GIS database design
  • Practicum assistant & internship at Bappeda Sleman during studies

Selected Work

Case studies of ongoing & completed projects. This list keeps growing.

Kalimantan Wildfire Mapping & Analysis

End-to-end remote sensing pipeline: from raw satellite data to publication-ready visualization & quantitative validation based on ASEAN/CIFOR standards.

0
Hotspots detected
(August 2026)
0
Cross-validated points
(≥2 satellite sensors)
0
Historical periods
compared (2015/2019/2026)
0
Estimated burned area
(dNBR, 3 sample sites)

Hotspot Timelapse: August 2026

NASA FIRMS data (VIIRS + MODIS), filtered by confidence level, cross-validated between sensors via spatial buffer analysis (not just coordinate rounding). 7-day rolling-window visualization follows Copernicus EMS/EFFIS (Europe) & Sentinel Asia/ASMC (Asia) cartographic standards.

  • Confidence filtering + cross-sensor dedupe
  • Scale bar, north arrow, province boundaries, legend
  • ColorBrewer YlOrRd color scheme (research-validated, colorblind-safe)
Kalimantan hotspot timelapse August 2026

Historical Comparison: 2015 vs 2019 vs 2026

Is this wildfire crisis a recurring pattern? Compared using the same sensor combination (MODIS + VIIRS_SNPP) across all three periods for a fair comparison. NOAA-20 has only been available since 2017/2018, so it was excluded from the historical analysis.

  • August 2026: 108,429 hotspots, the highest of the 3 periods
  • Geographic cluster pattern consistently recurs every year
  • FIRMS Standard Processing archive data for 2015/2019
Province 201520192026
totalhigh-conf. totalhigh-conf. totalhigh-conf.
Kalimantan Barat25,9244,45316,3632,86046,8239,130
Kalimantan Tengah33,8285,33212,3471,60638,0136,562
Kalimantan Timur9,8051,6182,61332310,7872,095
Kalimantan Selatan5,8207522,3602868,7801,429
Kalimantan Utara3,5965937961231,716209

Hotspot counts, August only, matched sensors (VIIRS-SNPP + MODIS) across all three years for a fair comparison. "High-confidence" is FIRMS's own per-detection quality flag — a stricter subset of "total" that's less likely to include noise (e.g. sun glint, sensor artifacts), so it's a good sanity check on the raw count.

Historical wildfire comparison chart

Recurring Hotspot Zones, 2015–2026

Small-multiples to see whether the worst fire clusters appear in the same geographic location every year, indicating a recurring risk area (likely linked to peatland).

  • Two zones — the southwestern coastal belt of West Kalimantan, and the Central/South Kalimantan border area — show up as the densest clusters in all three years, 2015, 2019, and 2026 alike
  • Both zones sit on Kalimantan's major peatland — consistent with peat fires being harder to fully put out and more likely to reignite on the same land
  • The rest of Kalimantan stays comparatively quiet in every period — activity concentrates in the same places rather than shifting around randomly
3-year comparison map

Visual Validation: Sentinel-2 & dNBR

Hotspots alone aren't enough. Some turned out to be false positives from mining sites, not vegetation fires. Validated with 10m-resolution Sentinel-2 optical imagery and calculated dNBR (delta Normalized Burn Ratio) — an index that measures how much vegetation condition changed before vs. after a fire, from satellite images — following the official Guideline on Burned Area Mapping and Estimation in Southeast Asia (ASEAN Secretariat & CIFOR, 2025).

  • NBR = (NIR − SWIR) / (NIR + SWIR), Sentinel-2 bands B08/B12
  • Severity classification + burned area estimate (hectares)
  • Provincial hotspot ranking (own FIRMS data) matches independent news/BPBD reports for Aug 2026 — absolute counts differ by methodology, but the relative order lines up
Combined map and Sentinel-2 before-after page

⚠ Data is indicative, for learning/portfolio purposes, not an official government report. Sources: NASA FIRMS, Copernicus Sentinel-2 (via Copernicus Data Space Ecosystem), geoBoundaries. dNBR thresholds follow Key & Benson (2006), not yet fully ground-truth validated per Chapter 5 of the ASEAN guideline.

← Back to project list

Tools & Methodology

  • Spatial Data Analysis
  • Spatial Data Creation
  • Programming for Spatial
  • Cartography
  • Database Management
  • QGIS
  • ArcGIS
  • Remote Sensing
  • Claude Code
  • Gemini CLI
  • AI API Integration
  • Prompt Engineering
  • Agentic Workflow
  • LLM Integration
  • Automated Workflow

Let's Connect

Open to discussing GIS, remote sensing, AI automation, or project collaboration.